COP28 nations strike historic fossil fuel deal
Summary
- COP28 reaches deal to reduce fossil fuels consumption
- Summit President Sultan al-Jaber calls accord âhistoricâ
- Small island states say deal does not do enough
- OPEC wanted focus on emissions not fuels
DUBAI, Dec 13 (Reuters) â Representatives from nearly 200 countries agreed at the COP28 climate summit on Wednesday to begin reducing global consumption of fossil fuels to avert the worst of climate change, signalling the eventual end of the oil age.
The deal struck in Dubai after two weeks of hard-fought negotiations was meant to send a powerful message to investors and policy-makers that the world is united in its desire to break with fossil fuels, something scientists say is the last best hope to stave off climate catastrophe.
COP28 President Sultan al-Jaber called the deal âhistoricâ but added that its true success would be in its implementation.
âWe are what we do, not what we say,â he told the crowded plenary at the summit. âWe must take the steps necessary to turn this agreement into tangible actions.â
Several countries cheered the deal for accomplishing something that until now eluded decades of climate talks.
âIt is the first time that the world unites around such a clear text on the need to transition away from fossil fuels,â Norwayâs Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide said.
More than 100 countries had lobbied hard for strong language in the COP28 agreement to âphase outâ oil, gas and coal use, but came up against powerful opposition from the Saudi Arabia-led oil producer group OPEC, which said the world can cut emissions without shunning specific fuels.
That battle pushed the summit a full day into overtime on Wednesday, and had some observers worried the negotiations would end at an impasse.
Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries control nearly 80% of the worldâs proven oil reserves along with about a third of global oil output, and their governments rely heavily on those revenues.
Small climate-vulnerable island states, meanwhile, were among the most vocal supporters of language to phase out fossil fuels and had the backing of major oil and gas producers such as the United States, Canada and Norway, as well as the European Union and scores of other governments.
âThis is a moment where multilateralism has actually come together and people have taken individual interests and attempted to define the common good,â U.S. climate envoy John Kerry said after the deal was adopted.
The lead negotiator for the Alliance of Small Island States, Anne Rasmussen, criticized the deal as unambitious.
âWe have made an incremental advancement over business as usual, when what we really need is an exponential step change in our actions,â she said.
But she did not formally object to the pact, and her speech drew a standing ovation that lasted nearly two minutes.
Danish Minister for Climate and Energy Dan Jorgensen marvelled at the circumstances of the deal: âWeâre standing here in an oil country, surrounded by oil countries, and we made the decision saying letâs move away from oil and gas.â
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
The deal calls for âtransitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner ⌠so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science.â
To some extent, that language describes what has already begun to happen, with some governments enacting policies in recent years to transition to a greener economy.
Europe and the U.S. have retired fleets of coal-fired power plants; global installation of renewable power capacity is at record levels and many countries have policies to encourage sales of electric vehicles.
The deal calls on governments to accelerate that â specifically by tripling of renewable energy capacity globally by 2030, speeding up efforts to reduce coal use, and accelerating technologies such as carbon capture and storage that can clean up hard-to-decarbonise industries.
A source familiar with Saudi Arabiaâs position described the deal as âa menu where every country can follow its own pathway,â saying it âshows the various tracks that will allow us to maintain the objective of 1.5 (degrees Celsius) in accordance with the characteristics of every nation and in the context of sustainable development.â
Several other oil producer countries, including the summit host UAE, had advocated for a role for carbon capture in the pact. Critics say the technology remains expensive and unproven at scale, and say it can be used to justify continued drilling.
Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore also welcomed the deal, but said: âThe influence of petrostates is still evident in the half measures and loopholes included in the final agreement.â
Now that the deal is struck, countries are responsible for delivering through national policies and investments.
China, the worldâs biggest carbon polluter today, suggested that industrialised countries should lead the way.
âDeveloped countries have unshirkable historical responsibilities for climate change,â the countryâs vice environment minister Zhao Yingmin said after the pact was approved.
Share This: